tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8320221605077796058.post7255088637529972785..comments2023-09-06T11:00:18.404-04:00Comments on SEC Expats: And Missouri makes 14?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8320221605077796058.post-6035031799106468372011-09-21T12:42:38.471-04:002011-09-21T12:42:38.471-04:00Missouri does NOT have an invite. Any news you he...Missouri does NOT have an invite. Any news you hear is coming out of KC... There was more chirping going on when it was rumored for Texas A&M. Missouri is simply doing a PR play to get the B1G started in adding more teams. They are not a culture fit to the SEC. Even their fans will say so.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8320221605077796058.post-52787026711769951612011-09-21T07:13:49.647-04:002011-09-21T07:13:49.647-04:00This makes perfect sense. Part of me always wonder...This makes perfect sense. Part of me always wondered why Auburn didn't start in the East in '92. Vanderbilt is on a more western longitude line than Auburn, and they wanted to be able to play 'Bama, Georgia and Florida every year. <br /><br />Which brings up the question, exactly when did the schedule change come in - the one where it switched from having 2 permanent inter-division foes and 1 rotating to 1 permanent and 2 rotating? I don't remember anyone saying anything. And I wonder how much Auburn had to be paid to keep quiet, as I'm sure losing the permanent Florida game rubbed somebody on the plains the wrong way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8320221605077796058.post-47737900680204257242011-09-21T07:10:52.350-04:002011-09-21T07:10:52.350-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8320221605077796058.post-28660685996316799542011-09-21T06:59:04.183-04:002011-09-21T06:59:04.183-04:0014 schools, but only 11 nicknames. Three "Tig...14 schools, but only 11 nicknames. Three "Tigers" and two "Bulldogs."<br /><br />And if they take in Clemson ... total chaos!<br /><br />You see the real problem with superconferences now?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com